The S&P index advanced 5.61% for the first four months of 2006. The
components of the index that enjoyed the biggest gains were the Energy,
Materials, and Telecommunication services advancing 14.15%, 10.59% and
10.08% respectively. The lagging components were Health care and Utilities,
both down 2.38% and 0.66 % respectively. As one can easily deduce, the two
leading sectors so far this year (Energy and Materials) are
commodities-heavy; be it oil and gas or gold and silver.
Looking ahead to the third and fourth quarters, we
believe that the
US markets will be preoccupied
with inflation concerns, concerns about the health of the overall economy,
and geopolitical tensions. With the
US economy growing at a 4.8 %
annual rate in the first quarter it seems reasonable that the equity markets
are performing as well as they did so far this year. However, fears
about inflation and a slow down in the rate of GDP growth will quickly set
in, giving way to a direction less market in the back half of 2006.
After four years of economic expansion it is pretty tough to predict when
this cycle will come to an end; but it is surely coming to an end at some
point. Thus, we see the stock market being controlled by sentiments
fueled by the data coming out. We will see any robust economic data
being interpreted as good (economy is growing) or bad (inflationary). Weak
economic data on the other hand will be interpreted as good (the Fed will
stop raising interest rates) or bad (the economy is slowing down and so are
corporate earnings). Our strategy going forward is to start locking in
profits and slowly turning more defensive in our portfolio construction.
One cannot ignore the performance of the Energy and
Materials sectors so far this year. While it is very tempting to increase
exposure to those two sectors given their performance, it is more prudent to
be selective in allocating capital to those two areas in our opinion. The
main question that needs to be answered is whether the recent increase in
oil prices is a result of a structural change, as many advocate, or whether
it is just a temporary bubble, as many advocate as well. In our view, oil
prices are positively correlated with global GDP growth and global
geopolitical risks; particularly those involving oil producing countries.
Given that GDP growth around the globe has been robust and geopolitical risk
is pretty high vis-à-vis several oil producing countries then it is no
surprise that oil prices have been hitting all time highs. Our position
continues to be that GDP growth is cyclical and geopolitical risks are
usually transitory factors and thus we expect oil prices to continue to
fluctuate with a large risk premium built in. However, we are avoiding the
oil sector all together at this point because of our value bias and our view
that the consequences of being on the wrong side of such a trade are pretty
dire at these levels. While we are avoiding oil, we are looking to
increase our exposure to Gold. As we mentioned in our first quarter
commentary, we believe that gold will offer a triple play on the three major
themes that we see going forward: a hedge against geopolitical risks,
inflation, and a weaker dollar.
|